SENTENCING GUIDELINES

[2020] EWCA Crim 147
[2020] EWCA Crim 147
CA (Crim Div) (Thirlwall LJ, Cheema-Grubb J, Judge Wendy Joseph QC)
12 February 2020

Where a person imported and dealt in Class A drugs over a long period, it was inescapable that an immediate custodial sentence of some length would be imposed, regardless of whether that person was of positive good character with every expectation of good behaviour in future. A judge’s imposition of a suspended sentence in such circumstances had therefore been inappropriate.

[2020] EWCA Civ 9
[2020] EWCA Civ 9
CA (Civ Div) (Underhill LJ, David Richards LJ, Leggatt LJ)
23 January 2020

The fact that an injunction against “persons unknown” referred to the requirement for an “intention” to impede lawful activities did not render the injunction insufficiently clear or certain to be enforceable by committal to prison following a breach. “Intention” did not have any special legal meaning and was not difficult for a member of the public to understand.

[2020] EWCA Crim 102
[2020] EWCA Crim 102
CA (Crim Div) (Haddon-Cave LJ, Eady J, Johnson J)
23 January 2020

A sentence of 27 months’ imprisonment which had been imposed on a man who had pleaded guilty to entering into or becoming concerned in a money-laundering arrangement was not manifestly excessive. The man had been a trusted courier of large amounts of money in a cigarette-smuggling operation.

[2020] NICA 1
[2020] NICA 1
CA (NI) (Morgan LCJ, Stephens LJ, McCloskey LJ)
8 January 2020

The Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland gave guidance on the correct approach to sentencing for fraud and theft where an offender was in a position of trust.

[2019] EWCA Crim 2286
[2019] EWCA Crim 2286
CA (Crim Div) (Lord Burnett LCJ, Fulford LJ, Holroyde LJ)
20 December 2019

In conjoined appeals against sentence brought by two young offenders and an adult offender, the court considered the proper approach to sentencing offenders who suffered from autism or other mental health conditions or disorders.

[2019] EWCA Crim 2174
[2019] EWCA Crim 2174
CA (Crim Div) (Dingemans LJ, Lambert J, Judge Mark Brown)
6 December 2019

Convictions for assault by penetration and sexual assault were safe, despite inadmissible opinion evidence from prosecution witnesses having been adduced before the jury. The total sentence was, however, reduced from eight years’ imprisonment to five years to reflect the overall criminality involved.

[2019] EWCA Crim 2236
[2019] EWCA Crim 2236
CA (Crim Div) (Dingemans LJ, Jacobs J, Judge Walden-Smith)
5 December 2019

Sentences of two years’ imprisonment and two years and six months’ imprisonment imposed on two men who had stolen money from a blind busker were not manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge had been entitled, in the interests of justice, to depart from the sentencing guideline because of the offenders’ serious and extensive criminal records.

[2019] EWCA Crim 2008
[2019] EWCA Crim 2008
CA (Crim Div) (Simon LJ, Cockerill J, Judge Bate)
19 November 2019

A sentencing judge had erred in failing to reach a conclusion on the category of culpability under the Manslaughter Definitive Guideline 2018 of a woman convicted of manslaughter for stabbing to death her partner after a history of domestic violence. A category and starting point should be decided before consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors.

[2019] EWCA Crim 2282
[2019] EWCA Crim 2282
CA (Crim Div) (Nicola Davies LJ, Jacobs J, Judge Lodder QC)
14 November 2019

A sentence of 20 months’ detention imposed following a guilty plea to causing serious injury by dangerous driving was reduced to 14 months to reflect the young offender’s personal mitigation, including his age, inexperience, injuries and remorse. He was six weeks short of his eighteenth birthday at the time of the offence and, in reducing the sentence, the court took account of the guideline for sentencing children and young people, which referred to appropriate sentences where a significant age threshold was passed.

[2019] EWCA Crim 1836
[2019] EWCA Crim 1836
CA (Crim Div) (Simon LJ, Cockerill J, Judge Bate)
1 November 2019

Although two defendants who had pleaded guilty to violent disorder and had been convicted of applying a corrosive fluid with intent to cause grievous bodily harm were dangerous within the meaning of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Pt 12 s.229, determinate sentences of 12 and 14 years’ imprisonment provided a sufficient degree of protection to the public to make an extended sentence unnecessary. An extended sentence, including a custodial term of 16 years, was appropriate for a third defendant convicted of similar offences, who had armed himself with the corrosive fluid and had used it indiscriminately, and had previous convictions which indicated a pattern of offending.

Scroll to top